Abstract
Introduction: In the dental implant scenario, the graft to treat severely reabsorbed jaws is currently the gold standard procedure. Still, there are flaws in this procedure until 30.0 % are reported in the literature. Zygomatic implants have shown, in many cases, improved clinical outcomes compared to bone grafts and represent an essential alternative for compromised maxillary bone. Objective: It was analyzed the main literary findings on the use of the zygomatic implant as a necessary alternative for a dental implant. Methods: The PRISMA Platform systematic review rules were followed. The search was carried out from November 2024 to January 2025 in the Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar databases. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: 122 articles were found, 36 articles were evaluated in full and 34 were included and developed in the present systematic review study. Considering the Cochrane tool for risk of bias, the overall assessment resulted in 24 studies with a high risk of bias and 38 studies that did not meet GRADE and AMSTAR-2. Most studies did not show homogeneity in their results, with X2=83.7%>50%. It was concluded that the zygomatic implant is revolutionizing the procedure of implants in the posterior atrophic maxilla, eliminating the complications of bone augmentation and sinus elevation with delayed cicatrization. Zygomatic implants have, in many cases, shown better clinical results compared to bone grafts and represent a possible gold standard for dental implants.