Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Review
Published: 03-12-2025

Major considerations and clinical outcomes of digital implant dentistry in guided bone regeneration: a systematic review

UNORTE - University Center of Northern São Paulo, Dentistry department, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil / UNIPOS - Post graduate and continuing education, Dentistry department, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
UNORTE - University Center of Northern São Paulo, Dentistry department, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil / UNIPOS - Post graduate and continuing education, Dentistry department, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
UNORTE - University Center of Northern São Paulo, Dentistry department, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil / UNIPOS - Post graduate and continuing education, Dentistry department, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
UNORTE - University Center of Northern São Paulo, Dentistry department, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil / UNIPOS - Post graduate and continuing education, Dentistry department, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
Bone regeneration Guided bone regeneration Implant dentistry CAD-CAM

Abstract

Introduction: It is estimated that up to 43% of osseointegrated implants require guided bone regeneration (GBR) as part of the patient's rehabilitation. Bone loss or insufficiency presents a major challenge for osseointegration. In this sense, the use of CAD-CAM systems (Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing) is highlighted in this process. Objective: It elucidated the current clinical considerations of the use of guided bone regeneration for dental implants through the use of CAD-CAM systems. Methods: The PRISMA Platform systematic review rules were followed. The search was carried out from November 2024 to January 2025 in the Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar databases. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: 118 articles were found, 30 articles were evaluated in full and 12 were included and developed in the present systematic review study. Considering the Cochrane tool for risk of bias, the overall assessment resulted in 20 studies with a high risk of bias and 31 studies that did not meet GRADE and AMSTAR-2. Most studies did not show homogeneity in their results, with X2=79.5%>50%. Guided bone regeneration is well documented and constitutes a predictable and successful approach to lateral and vertical bone augmentation of atrophic ridges. Thus, guided bone regeneration is considered one of the most commonly applied methods to reconstruct alveolar bone and to treat peri-implant bone deficiencies, as well as to replace lost bone and allow the implant to be fully integrated and maintained during functional loading. The use of digital tools for the automated fabrication of implant parts (CAD-CAM) is an optimizing reality in Dentistry. CAD-CAM enables high-quality, standardized, accurate, and detail-perfect prosthetic restorations. The use of metallic implants in the morse cone system in association with zirconia abutments guarantees a final product with mechanical resistance, biocompatibility, and aesthetics. Also, immunomodulatory guided bone regeneration membranes are developed mainly by improving macrophage recruitment and aggregation as well as regulating macrophage polarization.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

How to Cite

Gerez, C., Lourenço, L. R., Cicareli, A. J., & Idalgo, F. A. (2025). Major considerations and clinical outcomes of digital implant dentistry in guided bone regeneration: a systematic review. MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 6(S2). https://doi.org/10.54448/mdnt25S203