Abstract
Introduction: The long-term success of a dental implant depends on the prosthesis. The key to obtaining perfect dentures depends on the passive seating between its connector and the implant itself. The compromised fit between the contact surfaces of implant-supported prostheses creates uncontrolled tensions in the peri-implant components and tissues, evoking biological and mechanical complications. Objective: Considering that choosing the most precise technique and material for each particular case has become a challenging task for professionals, this study aimed to review the literature on the types of impression used in implant prostheses. Methods: The PRISMA Platform systematic review rules were followed. The search was carried out from July to August 2024 in the Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar databases. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: A total of 228 articles were found, and 84 articles were evaluated in full, and 29 were included and developed in the present systematic review study. Considering the Cochrane tool for risk of bias, the overall assessment resulted in 20 studies with a high risk of bias and 90 studies that did not meet GRADE. The choice of closed tray or open tray impression techniques depends on the number, depth, angulation, and relative parallelism of the implants. The materials of choice for making impressions, following the closed-tray and open-tray printing techniques, were polyether and polyvinylsiloxane. Most studies reported more accurate impressions with the splinting technique than with the non-splitting technique. Acrylic resin was the most frequently used material. Therefore, minimizing contraction appears to be the most important factor in ensuring an accurate impression for this technique. Digital printing has achieved high patient acceptance, reduces possible impression and master mold errors, reduces time in the chair, provides a three-dimensional image of the preparation, and ease of communication between the clinician and the laboratory. However, there is a dearth of scientific data regarding implant fingerprints and their accuracy. Research on implant fingerprinting has been limited to a few in vitro studies and case reports.