Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
MedNext Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
Review
DOI: 10.54448/mdnt23S221
Submitted: 07-12-2023
Published: 07-12-2023

Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic review

UNORTE - University Center of Northern São Paulo, Dentistry department, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
UNORTE - University Center of Northern São Paulo, Dentistry department, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
UNORTE - University Center of Northern São Paulo, Dentistry department, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
UNORTE - University Center of Northern São Paulo, Dentistry department, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil / UNIPOS - Post graduate and continuing education, Dentistry department, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
Bone regeneration Guided bone regeneration Implant dentistry Biomaterials. Membranes

Abstract

Introduction: The rehabilitation of the dental arch with osseointegrated implants makes it possible to improve the quality of life of patients. Guided bone regeneration (GBR) has been applied to replace lost bone to allow the implant to be fully integrated and maintained during functional loading. GBR is considered one of the most commonly applied methods to reconstruct alveolar bone and to treat peri-implant bone deficiencies. Objective: It was to develop a systematic review to highlight the main approaches of guided surgery to promote bone regeneration in implant dentistry. Methods: The systematic review rules of the PRISMA Platform were followed. The search was carried out from March to May 2023 in the Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar databases, using articles from 1977 (Golden pattern - Bra°nemark et al. ) to 2023. Results and Conclusion: A total of 117 articles were found, 38 articles were evaluated and 28 were included and developed in this systematic review study. Considering the Cochrane tool for risk of bias, the overall assessment resulted in 22 studies with a high risk of bias and 15 studies that did not meet GRADE. It was concluded that the application of a membrane to prevent nonosteogenic tissues from interfering with bone regeneration is a fundamental principle. Membrane properties and biological outcomes drive bone regeneration in membrane-covered defects. Barrier membranes play the role of preventing the invasion of soft tissue by exiting the mucosa and creating an underlying space to support bone growth. Collagen membranes have excellent biological properties and bone regeneration results. While collagen membranes do not provide sufficient mechanical protection of the covered bone defect, titanium-reinforced membranes, and non-resorbable membranes need to be removed in a second surgery.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Girón J, Kerstner E, Medeiros T, Oliveira L, Machado GM, Malfatti CF, Pranke P. Biomaterials for bone regeneration: an orthopedic and dentistry overview. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2021 Jun 14;54(9):e11055. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X2021e11055.
  2. Gugliandolo A, Fonticoli L, Trubiani O, Rajan TS, Marconi GD, Bramanti P, Mazzon E, Pizzicannella J, Diomede F. Oral Bone Tissue Regeneration: Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Secretome, and Biomaterials. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 May 15;22(10): 5236. doi: 10.3390/ijms22105236.
  3. You JS, Kim SG, Oh JS, Kim JS. Effects of Platelet-Derived Material (Platelet-Rich Fibrin) on Bone Regeneration. Implant Dent. 2019 Mar 8. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000877].
  4. Pye AD, Lockhart DEA, Dawson MP, Murray CA, Smith AJ. A review of dental implants and infection. J Hosp Infect ; 2009, 72:104–110.
  5. Bra°nemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 1977, 16:1–192.
  6. Bugarin Júnior JG, GarrafaII V. Bioethics and biosafety: the use of biomaterials in dental practice. Rev Saúde Pública. 2007, 41(2):223-8.
  7. Mazaro JVQ, Godoy Pai, Junior JFS, Mello CC, Pellizzer EP, Zavanelli AC; Regeneração óssea guiada em implantodontia: relato de caso ; RFO, Passo Fundo. 2014, v. 19, n. 1, p. 121-128.
  8. Tahmaseb A, WU V, Wismeijer D, et al. The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018, 29(Suppl 16):416–35.
  9. Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D, Coucke W, et al. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014, 29(Suppl):25– 42.
  10. Jung RE, Schneider D, Ganeles J, et al. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009, 24(Suppl):92– 109.
  11. D’Haese J, Van De Velde T, Komiyama A, et al. Accuracy and complications using computer-designed stereolithographic surgical guides for oral rehabilitation by means of dental implants: a review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res;2012, 14:321–35.
  12. Oh JH, An X, Jeong SM, et al. Digital workflow for computer-guided implant surgery in edentulous patients: a case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017, 75: 2541–9.
  13. El Kholy K, Janner SFM, Schimmel M, et al. The influence of guided sleeve height, drilling distance, and drilling key length on the accuracy of static computerassisted implant surgery. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019, 21(1):101–7.
  14. Zhou W, Liu Z, Song L, et al. Clinical factors affecting the accuracy of guided implant surgery-a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract;18:28–40, 2018.
  15. Cassetta M, Bellardini M. How much does experience in guided implant surgery play a role in accuracy? A randomized controlled pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017, 46:922–30.
  16. Rungcharassaeng K, Caruso JM, Kan JY, et al. Accuracy of computer-guided surgery: a comparison of operator experience. J Prosthet Dent; 2015, 114:407–13.
  17. D'Haese J, Ackhurst J, Wismeijer D, DE Bruyn H, Tahmaseb A. current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery. Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):121-133. doi: 10.1111/prd.12175.
  18. Pommer B, Busenlechner D, Fürhauser R, Watzek G, Mailath-Pokorny G, Haas R. Trends in techniques to avoid bone augmentation surgery: Application of short implants, narrowdiameter implants and guided surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 Oct;44(10):16301634. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.08.012.
  19. Oliveira G, Mattos W, Albaricci M, Marcantonio É, Queiroz T, Margonar R. Original Research: Analysis of linear and angular deviations of implants installed with a tomographic guided surgery technique. A prospective cohort-study. J Oral Implantol. 2019 Jun 17. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-18-00265.
  20. AL YAFI F, CAMENISCH B, AL-SABBAGH M. Is Digital Guided Implant Surgery Accurate and Reliable? Dent Clin North Am. 2019 Jul;63(3):381-397. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2019.02.006.
  21. Elgali I, Omar O, Dahlin C, Thomsen P. Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited. Eur J Oral Sci. 2017 Oct;125(5):315-337. doi: 10.1111/eos.12364.
  22. Zhang M, Zhou Z, Yun J, Liu R, Li J, Chen Y, Cai H, Jiang HB, Lee ES, Han J, Sun Y. Effect of Different Membranes on Vertical Bone Regeneration: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jul 14;2022:7742687. doi: 10.1155/2022/7742687.
  23. Ren Y, Fan L, Alkildani S, Liu L, Emmert S, Najman S, Rimashevskiy D, Schnettler R, Jung O, Xiong X, Barbeck M. Barrier Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR): A Focus on Recent Advances in Collagen Membranes. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Nov 29;23(23):14987. doi: 10.3390/ijms232314987.
  24. Rider P, Kačarević ŽP, Elad A, Tadic D, Rothamel D, Sauer G, Bornert F, Windisch P, Hangyási DB, Molnar B, Bortel E, Hesse B, Witte F. Biodegradable magnesium barrier membrane used for guided bone regeneration in dental surgery. Bioact Mater. 2021 Nov 29;14:152-168. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.11.018.
  25. Jung N, Park J, Park SH, Oh S, Kim S, Cho SW, Kim JE, Moon HS, Park YB. Improving Bone Formation by Guided Bone Regeneration Using a Collagen Membrane with rhBMP-2: A Novel Concept. J Funct Biomater. 2023 Mar 22;14(3):170. doi: 10.3390/jfb14030170.
  26. Albiero AM, Benato R, Momic S, Degidi M. Guided-welded approach planning using a computer-aided designed prosthetic shell for immediately loaded complete-arch rehabilitations supported by conometric abutments. J Prosthet Dent. 2019 May 8. pii: S0022-3913(18)30742-X. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.12.002.
  27. Tallarico M, Martinolli M, Kim Y, Cocchi F, Meloni SM, Alushi A, Xhanari E. Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Template-Based Implant Placement Using Two Different SurgicalTemplates Designed with or without Metallic Sleeves: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Dent J (Basel). 2019 Apr 2;7(2). pii: E41. doi: 10.3390/dj7020041.
  28. Zhu H, Zhang L, Cai Z, Shan X. Dental Implant Rehabilitation After Jaw Reconstruction Assisted by Virtual Surgical Planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 Feb 19. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7278.

How to Cite

Esteves, M. E. T., Bianchini, R. M. G., Gonzatti, J. P. P., & Scriboni, A. B. (2023). Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic review. MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 4(S2). https://doi.org/10.54448/mdnt23S221