Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
MedNext Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
Review
DOI: 10.54448/mdnt23S219
Submitted: 06-24-2023
Published: 06-24-2023

Dental implant and aesthetics: a systematic review

UNORTE - University Center of Northern São Paulo, Dentistry department, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil / UNIPOS - Post graduate and continuing education, Dentistry department, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
UNORTE - University Center of Northern São Paulo, Dentistry department, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil / UNIPOS - Post graduate and continuing education, Dentistry department, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
UNORTE - University Center of Northern São Paulo, Dentistry department, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil / UNIPOS - Post graduate and continuing education, Dentistry department, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
UNORTE - University Center of Northern São Paulo, Dentistry department, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil / UNIPOS - Post graduate and continuing education, Dentistry department, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
UNORTE - University Center of Northern São Paulo, Dentistry department, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil / UNIPOS - Post graduate and continuing education, Dentistry department, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
Dental implant Aesthetics

Abstract

Introduction: Besides the aspects of oral physiological functions, visual appearance and aesthetics have been addressed as an important factors in this type of therapy. In restorative dentistry, a pleasant aesthetic has been described as a blending of natural dentition and prosthetic elements, in addition to the identification, adaptation, and correct conditioning of these elements with the marginal and peripheral tissues. Objective: The present study aimed to present the main factors supporting aesthetic excellence before and after the rehabilitation of former regions' use of dental implants. Methods: The systematic review rules of the PRISMA Platform were followed. The search was carried out from February to May 2023 in the Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar databases, using articles from 1985 to 2022. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: A total of 98 articles were found, 38 articles were evaluated in full and 31 were included and developed in this systematic review study. Considering the Cochrane tool for risk of bias, the overall assessment resulted in 10 studies with a high risk of bias and 30 studies that did not meet GRADE. It is important to know the biological structures of the soft and hard tissues around an osseointegrated dental implant (peri-implant referred to as peri-implant phenotype), in the context of peri-implant esthetic complications. Aesthetics has become a primary factor in the patient's expectations, and the duty of the surgeon's professional knowledge of the fundamental aspects in achieving this aspect of a correct treatment plan to meet the appropriate restorative and surgical protocols, thus being able to achieve satisfactory results is required. It notes that all efforts should be aimed at the final result.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Ogawa T, Sitalaksmi RM, Miyashita M, Maekawa K, Ryu M, Kimura-Ono A, Suganuma T, Kikutani T, Fujisawa M, Tamaki K, Kuboki T. Effectiveness of the socket shield technique in dental implant: A systematic review. J Prosthodont Res. 2022 Jan 11;66(1):12-18. doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00054.
  2. Gamborena I, Sasaki Y, Blatz MB. Predictable immediate implant placement and restoration in the esthetic zone. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021 Jan;33(1):158-172. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12716.
  3. Ye L, Hua Xi, Kou Qiang Yi, Xue Za Zhi. Current dental implant design and its clinical importance. 2017 Feb 1;35(1):18-28. Chinese. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2017.01.003.
  4. Baumgarten HA. New implant design for crestarl bone preservation: initial observations and case report PractProcedAesthet Dent 2005;17(10):735-740.
  5. Wang II, Barootchi S, Tavelli L, Wang HL. The peri-implant phenotype and implant esthetic complications. Contemporary overview. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021 Jan;33(1):212-223. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12709.
  6. Gomez-Meda R, Esquivel J, Blatz MB. The esthetic biological contour concept for implant restoration emergence profile design. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021 Jan;33(1):173184. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12714.
  7. Belser U, Buser D, Higginbottom F. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding esthetics in implant dentistry. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 2004a, 19(Suppl.), 73-74.
  8. Belser UC, Schmid B, Higginbottom F, Buser D. Outcome analysis of implant restorations located in the anterior maxilla: a review of the recent literature. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 2004b, 19 (Suppl.), 30-42.
  9. Benic GI, Wolleb K, Sancho-Puchades M, Ha¨mmerle CHF. Systematic review ofparameters and methods for the professional assessment of esthetics in dental implant research. J ClinPeriodontol 2012; 39 (Suppl. 12): 160–192.
  10. Bidra AS, Rungruanganunt P. Clinical outcomes of implant abutments in the anterior region: a systematic review. J EsthetRestor Dent. 2013 Jun;25(3):159-76.
  11. Bottino MA, Faria R., Buso L, Silgtz F. Implantodontia estética – O desenvolvimento de um novo pilar cerâmico, 2005, v. 2 , n 6 .
  12. Buser D, Von ARX. Surgical procedures in partially edentulous patients with ITI implants.Clin Oral Implant Res 2000; 11(SuppL):83-100.
  13. Cutrim ES, Santana IL, Bennati BB.Prótese sobre implante parafusada versus cimentada: uma revisão de literatura. Odontol. Clín.-Cient., Recife, 2011, Suplemento 535-540.
  14. Figueiredo CM, Dias RP, Amado FM, Rossi FCC, Ishikiriama BLC, Oliveira TM, Santos CF. O uso de implantes, enxerto ósseo e condicionamento do tecidogengival perimplantar na reabilitação estética de áreaanterior de maxila.Odontol. Clín.-Cient., Recife, 2011, 10 (3) 285-291.
  15. Francischone CE, Vasconcelos L. Osseointegração e as próteses unitárias. São Paulo: Artes médicas; 1998.
  16. Fredman AL, Green K, Salkin LM. An 18-year longitudinal study of untreated mucogingival defects. Journal of Periodontology 1999; 70(10): 1174-6.
  17. Le B, Nielsen B. Esthetic implant site development. Oral MaxillofacSurgClin North Am. 2015 May;27(2):283-311.
  18. Lindhhe J, Berglundhe T. A mucosa do perimplante. In: Lindhe J, Karring T, Lang PL, editors. Tratado de periodontia clínica e implantologia oral. 3. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 1999. p.631-9.
  19. Manfro R, Júnior WRN, Loureiro JA. Estética em implantodontia, da reconstrução à prótese -apresentação de um caso clínico. Rev. Cir. Traumatol. Buco-Maxilo-fac., Camaragibe, 2008, v.8, n.1, p. 35 - 40.
  20. Mesquita AMM, Souza ROA, Vasconcelos DK, Avelar RP, Bottino MA. Zirconia abutment: an alternative for anterior esthetic resolution- A case report. Implant news 2006;3(6):619-22.
  21. Mankoo T. Contemporary implant concepts in Aesthetic Dentistry: Prat 2: Immediate single tooth implants. PractProcedAesthet Dent. v.16, p. 61-68, 2004.
  22. Padovan LEM. Prótese imediata em implante unitário após enxerto ósseo em paciente fissurado: acompanhamento de um ano. Implant News, 2007,V.4, Nº 1 pag 31-35.
  23. Potashnick SR. Soft tissue modeling for the esthetic single tooth implant restoration. J Esthetic Dent, 1998, v. 10, p.121-131.
  24. Tosta M, Ferraz P, Filho GSM, Guerra L, Saraceni CHC, Tumenas I. Previsibilidade em áreas estéticas: o conceito da abordagem imediata. Rev. Dental Press Periodontia Implantol., Maringá, 2007, v.1, n.1, p.95-111.
  25. Sailler I, Zembic A, Jung RE, Hammerle CHF. Single-Tooth Implant Reconstructions: Esthetic Factors Influencing the Decision Between Titanium and Zirconia Abutments in Anterior Regions. European J Esthet Dent.2007;2(3):296- 310.
  26. Salama M. Timing, Positioning, and sequential stanging in Implant Esthetic Teraphy: A four dimensional perspective. Int. J. Restorative Dent 2007;27:313-323.
  27. Sanseverino CAM. Manipulação do tecido gengival para um melhor resultado. Paul Cir Dent 1998 maio-jun; 52(3): 203-204.
  28. Slagter KW, den Hartog L, Bakker NA, Vissink A, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM. Immediate placement of dental implants in the esthetic zone: a systematic review and pooled analysis. J Periodontol. 2014 Jul;85(7):e241-50.
  29. Tagliareni JM, Clarkson E. Basic concepts and techniques of dental implants. Dent Clin North Am. 2015 Apr;59(2):255-64.
  30. Tunes UR, Rappa GE. Atualização em Implantodontia e Periodontia. São Paulo, Artes Médicas, 1999.
  31. Yao J, Tang H, Gao XL, McGrath C, Mattheos N. Patients' expectations to dental implant: a systematic review of the literature. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Oct 29;12:153.

How to Cite

Freitas, R. B. de, Aredes, G. D. A., Cicareli, A. J., Idalgo, F. A., & Kassis, E. N. (2023). Dental implant and aesthetics: a systematic review. MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 4(S2). https://doi.org/10.54448/mdnt23S219