Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
MedNext Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
Review
DOI: 10.54448/mdnt23211
Submitted: 11-05-2023
Published: 11-05-2023

Dental balance in the arcs for the implants: a concise systematic review

UNORTE - University Center of Northern São Paulo, Dentistry department, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
UNORTE - University Center of Northern São Paulo, Dentistry department, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
UNORTE - University Center of Northern São Paulo, Dentistry department, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
UNORTE - University Center of Northern São Paulo, Dentistry department, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil / UNIPOS – Postgraduate and continuing education, Dentistry department, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
Dental implants Balance Dental Arch Implant geometry

Abstract

The teeth together perform the functions of mastication, protection, and support of related soft tissues, help in the articulation of words, and are an important factor in the aesthetics of the face. The macro geometry of the implant provides influences on osseointegration. In this sense, the various isolated characteristics (thread type, thread pitch, thread depth, face angle) must be studied so that the implant geometry can balance the compressive stress and tensile stress and produce a minimum shear force. The present study aimed to carry out a concise systematic review of the main considerations of dental balance in the arches in implant dentistry. Thus, knowledge of the direction of the teeth is of great importance in clinical implant dentistry for the correct installation of implants, which are very important for maintaining the balance of forces exerted by masticatory muscles (masseter muscle, temporal muscle, medial pterygoid muscle). In addition to this, the evaluation of the amount and density of bone available in the patient's edentulous site. It was concluded that the optimized aesthetic positioning of the implant presents numerous factors for the good aesthetic performance of an implant-supported prosthesis. The main conditions of the soft tissues, the amount of bone, and the location and inclination of the placed implant can be cited as the main ones. The correct positioning of the implant is linked to the location and axial inclination of the implant, aiming to favor the emergence profile and aesthetic contours of the prosthesis. The ideal location for the implant would be the one assumed by the lost tooth root. Also, the location of the height of the cervical portion of this implant concerning the adjacent teeth is important for determining the prosthetic space available for making the restoration, as well as its emergence profile and the biological space of the surrounding soft tissues.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Zieniewska I, Maciejczyk M, Zalewska A. The Effect of Selected Dental Materials Used in Conservative Dentistry, Endodontics, Surgery, and Orthodontics as Well as during the Periodontal Treatment on the Redox Balance in the Oral Cavity. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Dec 18;21(24):9684. doi: 10.3390/ijms21249684.
  2. Julià-Sánchez S, Álvarez-Herms J, Cirer-Sastre R, Corbi F, Burtscher M. The Influence of Dental Occlusion on Dynamic Balance and Muscular Tone. Front Physiol. 2020 Jan 31;10:1626. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01626.
  3. Amengual-Peñafiel L, Córdova LA, Constanza Jara-Sepúlveda M, Brañes-Aroca M, Marchesani-Carrasco F, Cartes-Velásquez R. Osteoimmunology drives dental implant osseointegration: A new paradigm for implant dentistry. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2021 Nov;57:12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2021.01.001.
  4. Milleret V, Lienemann PS, Gasser A, Bauer S, Ehrbar M, Wennerberg A. Rational design and in vitro characterization of novel dental implant and abutment surfaces for balancing clinical and biological needs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Mar;21 Suppl 1:15-24. doi: 10.1111/cid.12736.
  5. Kreve S, Ferreira I, da Costa Valente ML, Dos Reis AC. Relationship between dental implant macro-design and osseointegration: a systematic review. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Sep 29. doi: 10.1007/s10006-022-01116-4.
  6. Gekeler K, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Sachs H, MacLaren RE, Stingl K, Zrenner E, Gekeler F. Implantation, removal and replacement of subretinal electronic implants for restoration of vision in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar 9. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000467.
  7. Amrute JM, Athanasiou LS, Rikhtegar F, de la Torre Hernández JM, Camarero TG, Edelman ER. Polymeric endovascular strut and lumen detection algorithm for intracoronary optical coherence tomography images. J Biomed Opt. 2018 Mar;23(3):1-14. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.23.3.036010.
  8. Bauer DE, Hingsammer A, Schenk P, Vlachopoulos L, Imam MA, Fürnstahl P, Meyer DC. Are Commercially-available Precontoured Anatomical Clavicle Plating Systems Offering the Purported Superior Optimum Fitting to the Clavicle? A Cadaveric Analysis and Review of Literature. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Mar 16. pii: S1877-0568(18)30071-9. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.01.013.
  9. Pauchet D, Pigot JL, Chabolle F, Bach CA. Prefabricated fibula free flap with dental implants for mandibular reconstruction. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2018 Mar 2. pii: S1879-7296(18)30048-6. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2018.02.001.
  10. Schepers RH, Kraeima J, Vissink A, et al. Accuracy of secondary maxillofacial reconstruction with prefabricated fibula grafts using 3D planning and guided reconstruction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2016;44(4):392–9.
  11. Culié D, Dassonville O, Poissonnet G, Riss JC, Fernandez J, Bozec A. Virtual planning and guided surgery in fibular free-flap mandibular reconstruction: a 29- case series. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2016;133(3): 175–8.
  12. Alghamdi HS, Jansen JA. The development and future of dental implants. Dent Mater J. 2020 Mar 31;39(2):167-172. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2019-140.
  13. Jaquiéry C, Rohner D, Kunz C, et al. Reconstruction of maxillary and mandibular defects using prefabricated microvascular fibular grafts and osseointegrated dental implants – a prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15(5):598– 606.
  14. Ernoult C, Bouletreau P, Meyer C, Aubry S, Breton P, BacheletJT.[Reconstruction assisted by 3D printing in maxillofacial surgery]. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale 2015;116(2):95–102.
  15. Horiuchi K et al. Immediate loading of Brånemark system implants following placement in edentulous patients: a clinical report. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, Carol Stream, Illinois, EUA, 2000, v.15, p.824-830.
  16. Ivanoff et al. Influence of Bicortical or Monocortical Anchorage on Maxillary Implant stability: a 15-year retrospective study of Brånemark System Implants. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, Carol Stream, Illinois, EUA, 2000, v.15, n.1, p.103-110.
  17. Tabusea HE, Corrêaa CB, Vaza LG. Mechanical behavior of prostheses / implant system in the anterior region of maxilla: analysis by the method of cycling mechanics. Rev Odontol UNESP. 2014 Jan-Feb; 43(1): 46-51.
  18. Azari A, Nikzad S, Computer-assisted implantology: historical background and potential outcomes-a review. Int J Med Robot, 2008. 4(2): p. 95-104.
  19. Orentlicher GD. Goldsmith, and M. Abboud, Computer-guided planning and placement of dental implants. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, 2012. 20(1): p. 53-79.
  20. Orentlicher GA, Horowitz MA. Computer-guided implant surgery: indications and guidelines for use. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 2012. 33(10): p. 720- 32; quiz 733.
  21. Hultin MKG. Svensson, and M. Trulsson, Clinical advantages of computerguided implant placement: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012. 23 Suppl 6: p. 124-35.
  22. D'Haese J et al., Accuracy and complications using computer-designed stereolithographic surgical guides for oral rehabilitation by means of dental implants: a review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2012. 14(3): p. 321- 35.
  23. Di Torresanto VM et al., Computer-assisted flapless implant surgery in edentulous elderly patients: a 2-year follow up. Quintessence Int, 2014. 45(5): p. 419-29.
  24. Xu L et al., Immediate versus early loading of flapless placed dental implants: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent, 2014. 112(4): p. 760-9.
  25. Rocha SS, Souza DR, Fernandes JMA, Garcia RR, Zavanelli RA. Próteses Totais Fixas Tipo Protocolo Bimaxilares. Relato de Caso. Rev Odontol Bras Central 2013; v.21 n.60.

How to Cite

Belotti, G. S., Pereira, L. A., Zago, T. R., & Scriboni, A. B. (2023). Dental balance in the arcs for the implants: a concise systematic review. MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.54448/mdnt23211