Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
MedNext Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
Review
DOI: 10.54448/mdnt22310
Submitted: 08-28-2022
Published: 08-28-2022

Main clinical approaches to orthognathic surgery for class II open bite and genioplasty patients: a brief systematic review

UNORTE - University Center of Northern São Paulo - Dentistry department, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil / UNIPOS - Post graduate and continuing education, Dentistry department, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
UNORTE - University Center of Northern São Paulo - Dentistry department, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil / UNIPOS - Post graduate and continuing education, Dentistry department, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil / YC DENTAL - Specialties Dental Center, Guayaquil, Ecuador
UNORTE - University Center of Northern São Paulo - Dentistry department, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil / UNIPOS - Post graduate and continuing education, Dentistry department, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
UNORTE - University Center of Northern São Paulo - Dentistry department, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil / UNIPOS - Post graduate and continuing education, Dentistry department, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
UNORTE - University Center of Northern São Paulo - Dentistry department, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil/ UNIPOS - Post graduate and continuing education, Dentistry department, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Orthognathic surgery Class II Open bite Genioplasty Aesthetics Clinical trials

Abstract

Introduction: Orthognathic surgery (OS) is used to improve the patient's facial appearance and to correct maxillary and mandibular deformities resulting from malocclusions, disease, or trauma. In this context, genioplasty is a procedure to correct an aesthetic and functional deformity of the chin region, improving the contour. Moreover, anterior open bite (AOB) is the lack of vertical contact or negative overbite between the anterior teeth of the superior and inferior arches when the posterior teeth are in occlusion. Objective: The present study aimed to perform a brief systematic review with risk of bias analysis by funnel plot to highlight the main clinical approaches of orthognathic surgery in class II patients with open bites and also concerning genioplasty. Methods: The research was carried out from February 2022 to May 2022 and developed based on Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: A total of 115 articles were found. In total, 57 articles were fully evaluated and 34 were included and evaluated in this study. And of the total of 34 articles, only 11 articles were developed as the main clinical results. A total of 32 articles were excluded because they did not meet the GRADE classification, and 16 were excluded because they were at risk of bias. The symmetric funnel plot does not suggest a risk of bias between the small sample size studies. A retrospective observational study compared 57 patient charts on treatment outcomes for anterior occlusion and vertical skeletal stability after maxillary or mandibular surgery to correct Class II malocclusion with a mild to moderate open bite. After surgery, 87% of Le Fort I patients and 63% of patients with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy had a positive overbite, and at the 6-month follow-up, the percentages were 90% and 74%, respectively. Another study showed Class II patients had significantly greater amounts of lateral and lower translation than class III patients. Also, genioplasty represents one of the most common auxiliary procedures and may be associated with corrective surgery for dentofacial dysmorphisms. However, care must be taken with mental nerve injuries, asymmetries, and intraoperative bleeding are the main immediate complications.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Hirohi T. A New Concept of Narrowing Genioplasty: Home Plate-Shaped Sliding Osteotomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Aug 1;148(2):309-319. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008187.
  2. Alkhayer A, Piffkó J, Lippold C, Segatto E. Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review. Head Face Med. 2020 Dec 4;16(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13005-020-00250-2.
  3. Ferri J, Schlund M, Touzet-Roumazeille S. Orthognathic Surgery in Craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2021 Jan-Feb 01;32(1):141-148. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007154.
  4. Cascino F, Aboh IV, Giovannoni ME, Pini N, Zerini F, Del Frate R, Carangelo BR, Xu J, Gabriele G, Gennaro P, Iannetti G. Orthognathic surgery: a randomized study comparing Piezosurgery and Saw techniques. Ann Ital Chir. 2021;92:299304.
  5. Cunha G, Oliveira MR, Salmen FS, Gabrielli MFR, Gabrielli MAC. How does bone thickness affect the split pattern of sagittal ramus osteotomy? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Feb;49(2):218-223. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
  6. Steenen SA, Becking AG. Bad splits in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: systematic review of fracture patterns. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jul;45(7):887-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Feb 28.
  7. Lin HH, Lonic D, Lo LJ. 3D printing in orthognathic surgery − A literature review. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, v. 117, n. 7, p. 547–558, 2018.
  8. Di Blasio C, Anghinoni ML, Di Blasio A. Virtual planning of a complex threepart bimaxillary osteotomy. Case Reports in Dentistry, 2017, n. 4.
  9. Hernández-Alfaro F. et al. Three-Dimensional Analysis of Long-Term Stability After Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Fixed With a Single Miniplate With 4 Monocortical Screws and 1 Bicortical Screw: A Retrospective 2-Center Study. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery,2017, v. 75, n. 5, p. 1036–1045.
  10. Friscia M. et al. Complications after orthognathic surgery: our experience on 423 cases. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2017, v. 21, n. 2, p. 171–177.
  11. Kuvat SV. et al. Improving bony stability in maxillofacial surgery: use of osteogenetic materials in patients with profound (≥5 mm) maxillary advancement, a clinical study. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, 2009, v. 62, n. 5, p. 639–645.
  12. Abadi M, Pour OB. Genioplasty. Facial Plast Surg. 2015 Oct;31(5):513-22. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1567882.
  13. Trevisiol L. et al. Grafting of large mandibular advancement with a collagencoated bovine bone (bio-oss collagen) in orthognathic surgery. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 2012, v. 23, n. 5, p. 1343–1348.
  14. Rohner D, Hailemariam S, Hammer B. Le fort i osteotomies using Bio-Oss® Collagen to promote bony union: A prospective clinical split-mouth study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2013, v. 42, n. 5, p. 585– 591.
  15. Cacucci L, Ricci B, Moretti M, Gasparini G, Pelo S, Grippaudo C. Surgical Orthodontic Treatment of a Patient Affected by Type 1 Myotonic Dystrophy (Steinert Syndrome). Case Rep Dent. 2017;2017:7957961.
  16. Kassir C, Saade A. Nonsurgical Treatment of a Severe Skeletal Anterior Open Bite. J Clin Orthod. 2017 Feb;51(2):103-112.
  17. Feres MFN, Abreu LG, Insabralde NM, Almeida MR, Flores-Mir C. Effectiveness of the open bite treatment in growing children and adolescents. A systematic review. Eur. J. Orthod. 2015, 1–14.
  18. Albogha, M.H.; Takahashi, I.; Sawan, M.N. Early treatment of anterior open bite: Comparison of the vertical and horizontal morphological changes induced by magnetic bite-blocks and adjusted rapid molar intruders. Korean J Orthod 2015; 45(1):38-46.
  19. Torgersbråten N, Stenvik A, Espeland L. A comparison of Class II open bite correction by maxillary or mandibular surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 May;157(5):631-640. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.05.018. PMID: 32354436.
  20. Zupnik JT, Ioshida M, Yatabe M, Ruellas ACO, Gomes LR, Aronovich S, Benavides E, Edwards SP, Paniagua B, Cevidanes LHS. Three-dimensional analysis of condylar changes in surgical correction for open bite patients with skeletal class II and class III malocclusions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jun;48(6):739-745. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Feb 1. PMID: 30712988; PMCID: PMC6510631.
  21. Shokri T, Rosi-Schumacher M, Petrauskas L, Chan D, Ducic Y. Genioplasty and Mandibular Implants. Facial Plast Surg. 2021 Dec;37(6):709-715. doi: 10.1055/s0041-1735307.
  22. Esnault O. Les reprises de génioplasties [Secondary genioplasty]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2019 Nov;64(5-6):519-530. French. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2019.08.005. Epub 2019 Sep 9. PMID: 31515116.
  23. Bertossi D, Albanese M, Nocini R, Mortellaro C, Kumar N, Nocini PF. Osteotomy in Genioplasty by Piezosurgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2021 May 1;32(3):e317-e321. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000003150. PMID: 29944550.
  24. Zhang L, Ma WS, Bai JP, Li XX, Li HD, Zhu T, Sun JY, Ge HG, Pang Y, Xue F, Cheng LY, Jin R, Zhang Y, Sun XM, Zhang YG. Comprehensive Application of Autologous Costal Cartilage Grafts in Rhino- and Mentoplasty. J Craniofac Surg. 2019 Oct;30(7):2174-2177. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005858. PMID: 31425405.
  25. Bonitz L, El-Karmi A, Linssen J, Abel D, Hassfeld S, Bicsák Á. A randomized, prospective trial to assess the safety and efficacy of hilotherapy in patients after orthognathic surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Dec;25(4):525-532. doi: 10.1007/s10006-021-00948-w. Epub 2021 Mar 5. PMID: 33674933; PMCID: PMC8571232.
  26. El-Karmi A, Hassfeld S, Bonitz L. Development of swelling following orthognathic surgery at various cooling temperatures by means of hilotherapy-a clinical, prospective, monocentric, single-blinded, randomised study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Sep;46(9):1401-1407. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Feb 2. PMID: 30031593.
  27. Kim SC, Kwon JG, Jeong WS, Na D, Choi JW. One-Piece Mandibuloplasty Compared to Conventional Mandibuloplasty With Narrowing Genioplasty. J Craniofac Surg. 2018 Jul;29(5):1161-1168. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004458. PMID: 29521758.
  28. Troedhan A. Piezotome Genioplasty Reduces Postsurgical Morbidity and Enhances Patient Satisfaction: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jul;76(7):1564.e1-1564.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.02.015. Epub 2018 Feb 27. PMID: 29567435.
  29. Sidelmann JJ, Gram JB, Godtfredsen ACM, Thorn JJ, Ingerslev J, Pinholt EM. Orthognathic Surgery-Induced Fibrinolytic Shutdown Is Amplified by Tranexamic Acid. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jul;78(7):1183-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.02.026. Epub 2020 Mar 3. PMID: 32224082.

How to Cite

Oliveira, L. R. de, Sánchez, Y. Q., Braga, T. S., Moura Neto, G., & Moura, R. F. (2022). Main clinical approaches to orthognathic surgery for class II open bite and genioplasty patients: a brief systematic review. MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.54448/mdnt22310