Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
MedNext Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
Review
DOI: 10.54448/mdnt22304
Submitted: 07-12-2022
Published: 07-12-2022

Research of the osseointegration and saucerization process in bone regeneration for dental implants: a concise systematic review

UNORTE - University Center of Northern São Paulo - Dentistry department, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
UNORTE - University Center of Northern São Paulo - Dentistry department, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
UNORTE - University Center of Northern São Paulo - Dentistry department, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
UNORTE - University Center of Northern São Paulo - Dentistry department, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil / UNIPOS - Post graduate and continuing education, Dentistry department, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Implantology Bone regeneration Stomatognathic system Osseointegration Saucerization

Abstract

​Introduction: In the context of implantology, bone regeneration is a science that aims to recover bone elevation for dental implants, with its main focus being the stomatognathic system. The treatment of oral rehabilitation with implants obtained a substantial evolution through the concept of osseointegration. A physiological process of peri-implant bone remodeling was observed during numerous investigations related to osseointegration and implantology. And, specific immune cells such as macrophages play a crucial role in the dynamics of osseointegration. Objective: to present the main approaches and clinical results on the process of bone regeneration, osseointegration, and saucerization in the implantology scenario through a systematic review of the literature. Methods: The present study followed a systematic review model, following the rules of systematic review – PRISMA. The search strategy was performed in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: The total of 156 articles were found. A total of 74 articles were fully evaluated and 20 were included in this study. Considering the Cochrane tool for risk of bias, the overall assessment resulted in 50 studies that were excluded with a high risk of bias (studies with a small sample size). Also, 12 studies were excluded because they did not meet the GRADE. Based on the objective of the present study, it was concluded that bone saucerization around osseointegrated implants represents a fundamental process for dental implant success, and with a controlled immunological process.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Gupta R, Gupta N, Weber KK. Dental Implants. 2021 Aug 11. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan–. PMID: 29262027.
  2. Neto JDP, Melo G, Marin C, Rivero ERC, Cruz ACC, Flores-Mir C, Corrêa M. Diagnostic performance of periapical and panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography for detection of circumferential gaps simulating osseointegration failure around dental implants: A systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2021 Dec;132(6):e208-e222. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2021.08.012.
  3. Hooton TA, Neill BC, Rajpara A. Single Saucerization Biopsy Technique for Blistering Diseases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Jul 25. pii: S0190-9622(19)32449-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.07.059.
  4. Nevins M, Capetta E, Horning C, Kerr E, Kim DM, Kirshner K, Machell JC, Marcus E, Romanos G, Silverstein S, Strauss G, Wang HL, Winston M. Osseointegration Foundation Charity Overdenture Program Study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2020 Mar/Apr;40(2):279-283. doi: 10.11607/prd.4531.
  5. Hoellwarth JS, Tetsworth K, Kendrew J, Kang NV, van Waes O, Al-Maawi Q, Roberts C, Al Muderis M.Periprosthetic osseointegration fractures are infrequent and management is familiar. Bone Joint J. 2020 Feb;102-B(2):162-169. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B2.BJJ-2019-0697.R2.
  6. Zhang H, Komasa S, Mashimo C, Sekino T, Okazaki J. Effect of ultraviolet treatment on bacterial attachment and osteogenic activity to alkali-treated titanium with nanonetwork structures. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017 Jun 28;12:4633-4646. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S136273. eCollection 2017.
  7. Albanese M, Ricciardi G, Donadello D, Lucchese A, Gelpi F, Zangani A, DE Santis D, Rizzini A, Rossetto A, Bertossi D. Alveolar splitting with piezosurgery, bone bank grafts and Nobelactive implants as an alternative to major bone grafting for maxillary reconstruction. Minerva Stomatol. 2017 Jul 4. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4970.17.04006-7.
  8. Weiner S, Simon J, Ehrenberg DS, Zweig B, Ricci JL. The effects of laser microtextured collars upon crestal bone levels of dental implants. Implant Dent. 2008 Jun;17(2):217-28. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3181779016.
  9. Bruno F. Mello, Jefferson T. Pires, Danilo Jorge Racy, Michelini S. Trentin, Adriano Piattelli, Jamil Awad Shibli. Espaço biológico ao redor de implantes osseointegrados: uma análise fisiológica e histológica em tecido peri-implantar humano. (Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2016; 34:713–718.
  10. Ferrari DS, Piattelli A, Iezzi G, Faveri M, Rodrigues JA, Shibli JA. Effect of lateral static load on immediately restored implants: histologic and radiographic evaluation in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015 Apr;26(4):e51-6.
  11. Amengual-Peñafiel L, Córdova LA, Constanza Jara-Sepúlveda M, Brañes-Aroca M, Marchesani-Carrasco F, Cartes-Velásquez R. Osteoimmunology drives dental implant osseointegration: A new paradigm for implant dentistry. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2021 Nov;57:12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2021.01.001.
  12. Pessoa RS, Sousa RM, Pereira LM, Silva TD, Bezerra FJB, Spin-Neto R. Avaliação da estabilidade dos tecidos duros e moles em implantes imediatos com carga imediata em área estética: estudo clínico. Dental Press Implantol. 2015 Apr-Jun;9(2): 100-9.
  13. Coelho PG, Jimbo R. Osseointegration of metallic devices: current trends based on implant hardware design. Archives of biochemistry and biophysics. 2014; 561: 99-108.
  14. Coelho PG, Jimbo R, Tovar N, Bonfante EA. Osseointegration: hierarchical designing encompassing the macrometer, micrometer, and nanometer length scales. Dent Mater. 2015; 31(1): 37-52.
  15. Bezerra F, Pessoa RS, Zambuzzi WF. Carregamento funcional imediato ou precoce de implantes com câmara de cicatrização e nano-superfície: estudo clínico prospectivo longitudinal. Innov Implant J, Biomater Esthet. 2015; 9(2/3): 13-7.
  16. Sculean A, Gruber R, Bosshardt DD. Soft tissue wound healing around teeth and dental implants. J Clin Periodontol 2014. Apr; 41 Suppl 15: S6-22.
  17. Camacho FMT, Sakamura CE, Munhoz MF, Esteves JC, Ribeiro FS, Pontes AEF. Avaliação clínica em curto prazo do sistema de Cone Morse e plataforma reduzida em prótese sobre implantes do tipo protocolo: estudo piloto randomizado. Ver Odontol Unesp. Araraquara SP. 2012; 41(4):247-53.
  18. Consolaro A. Mecanismo da saucerização nos implantes osseointegrados. Rev Dental Press Periodontia Implantol. 2009;3(4):25-39.
  19. Consolaro A., Carvalho, RS, Francischone Jr.CE, Francischone, CE. Mecanismo da saucerização nos implantes osseointegrados. Rev. Dental Press Periodont Implantol. 2010;4(1):137-54.
  20. Deconto MA. Análise microbiológica in vitro do selamento bacteriano na conexão pilar/implante em implantes tipo cone morse: estudo comparativo de dois pilares protéticos [Dissertação]. Campinas-SP- Centro de Pesquisas Odontológicas São Leopoldo Mandic- 2008.

How to Cite

Marangoni, A. C., Campos, C. E. S., Capitelli, W., & Scriboni, A. B. (2022). Research of the osseointegration and saucerization process in bone regeneration for dental implants: a concise systematic review. MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.54448/mdnt22304