Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
MedNext Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
Review
DOI: 10.54448/mdnt22S309
Submitted: 13-05-2022
Published: 13-05-2022

Major clinical findings of minimally invasive surgery in dentistry: a systematic review

UNORTE - University Center of Northern São Paulo - Dentistry department, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil / UNIPOS - Post graduate and continuing education, Dentistry department, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
UNORTE - University Center of Northern São Paulo - Dentistry department, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil / UNIPOS - Post graduate and continuing education, Dentistry department, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
UNORTE - University Center of Northern São Paulo - Dentistry department, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil / UNIPOS - Post graduate and continuing education, Dentistry department, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
UNORTE - University Center of Northern São Paulo - Dentistry department, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil / UNIPOS - Post graduate and continuing education, Dentistry department, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Dental surgery Minimally invasive surgery Minimally invasive procedures Clinical studies

Abstract

Introduction: In the scenario of surgery or minimally invasive dental procedures there are more than 300 clinical studies. The studies were classified in the areas of periodontics, cardiology, implantology, endodontics, orthodontics, oral pathology, oral and maxillofacial surgery, prosthesis, and others. Uncertainty is about the conclusions obtained from a set of studies on minimally traumatic surgery. Objective: It was to demonstrate the evolution and consequent importance of improving minimally traumatic surgery techniques in dentistry. Methods: The present study followed a systematic review model, following the rules of systematic review – PRISMA. The search strategy was performed in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. The present study was carried out from January to March 2022. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. Results: A total of 121 articles were found. A total of 86 articles were fully evaluated and 27 were included in this study. Since the most primordial extraction techniques were created and developed, several attempts have been made to minimize the professional's effort, reduce surgical time and alleviate bleeding and the inflammatory processes, edema, pain, and ecchymosis that can affect patients, in trans and postoperative periods. Thus, maximum preservation of the integrity of soft tissues (papilla and free and attached gingiva) adjacent to the prosthetic spaces should be sought, and preservation of the level of the alveolar bone ridge, minimizing surgical trauma. Conclusion: There are many attempts to minimize the professional's effort, reduce surgical time and alleviate bleeding and inflammatory processes, edema, pain, and ecchymosis that can affect patients. Thus, maximum preservation of the integrity of the soft tissues adjacent to the prosthetic spaces and the preservation of the level of the alveolar bone ridge should be sought to achieve the minimization of surgical trauma.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Lee W. Immediate implant placement in fresh extraction sockets. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Feb 28;47(1):57-61. doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2021.47.1.57. PMID: 33632979; PMCID: PMC7925164.
  2. Koshy E, Annamma LM, George BT, Menezes GA. The retrieval of a surgical blade broken within the alveolar bone during minimally traumatic tooth extraction. BMJ Case Rep. 2021 Jan 27;14(1):e240162. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-240162. PMID: 33504539; PMCID: PMC7843332.
  3. Faciola Pessôa de Oliveira PG, Pedroso Bergamo ET, Bordin D, Arbex L, Konrad D, Gil LF, Neiva R, Tovar N, Witek L, Coelho PG. Ridge Architecture Preservation Following Minimally Traumatic Exodontia Techniques and Guided Tissue Regeneration. Implant Dent. 2019 Aug;28(4):319-328. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000886. PMID: 31008823.
  4. Al Qabbani A, Al Kawas S, EneZEI H, Razak NHA, AL Bayatti SW, Samsudin AR, Hamid SAB. Biomechanical and radiological assessment of immediate implants for alveolar ridge preservation. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 15(6):420-429, 2018.
  5. Amorim R.E.; Leal S.C.; Frencken J.E. Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis. Clin Oral Invest, 2011.
  6. Barreto, V.C. Avaliação das restaurações minimamente invasivas em pré-escolares. Dissertação (mestrado)-Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Faculdade de odontologia. Porto Alegre, 2007.
  7. Krug R, Connert T, Soliman S, Syfrig B, Dietrich T, Krastl G. Surgical extrusion with an atraumatic extraction system: A clinical study. J Prosthet Dent. 120(6):879-885, 2018 [doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.02.006. Epub 2018 Jun 28].
  8. Brasil. Ministério da saúde / Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Documento base da III Conferência Nacional de Saúde Bucal: acesso e qualidade, superando a exclusão social. Brasília, 2004.
  9. Cardoso AC. O. Passo-a-Passo da Prótese Sobre Implante. Ed. Santos, 1ª ed, 2005.
  10. Carvalho PS. Gerenciando os Riscos e Complicações em Implantodontia. Ed. Santos. São Paulo, 2007.
  11. Carvalho, L.S. Tratamento restaurador atraumático em cavidades atípicas. Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia. Porto Alegre, v.57, n.3, 357-362, 2009.
  12. Coato AM GW, Mariotti A. Immediate placement of anatomically shaped dental implants. J Oral Implantol; 26:170-176, 2000.
  13. Colares, V.; Franca, C.; Amorin F.H.A. O tratamento restaurador atraumático nas dentições decídua e permanente. Revista Portuguesa de Estomatologia, Medicina Dentária e Cirurgia Maxilofacial. V. 50, n.1, 35-41, 2009.
  14. Shetty V, P NK, Khanum A, Yadav A, Sailer HF. Minimally-invasive anterior maxillary distraction technique in patients with cleft lip and palate and maxillary deficiency: an evaluation of 106 patients. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Sep;58(7):777-783. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.03.026. Epub 2020 Jun 4. PMID: 32507641.
  15. Iraqui O, Lakhssassi N, Berrada S, Merzouk N. Atraumatic bone expansion: Interest of piezo-surgery, conicals expanders and immediate implantation combination. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale. 117(3):151-7, 2016 [doi: 10.1016/j.revsto.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 May 12].
  16. Hayes M, Allen E, DA Mata C, Mckenna G, Burke F. Minimal intervention dentistry and older patients part 2: minimally invasive operativeinterventions. Dent Update. 41(6):500-2, 504-5, 2014.
  17. Cooper LF, Rahman A, Moriarty J. Immediate mandibular rehabilitation with endosseous implants: simultaneous extraction, implant placement, and loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants;17:517-525, 2002.
  18. Covani V, Crespi R, Cornelini R, Barone A. Immediate implants supporting single-crown restoration: a 4 year prospective study. J Periodontol; 75:982-988, 2004.
  19. Foschetti JHM. Tratamento restaurador atraumático associado a medidas preventivas na saúde pública brasileira. Trabalho de conclusão de curso (Especialização) – Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 2010.
  20. Frencken JE, Holmgren CJ. Tratamento restaurador atraumático para a cárie dentária. São Paulo. Santos Editora, 2001.
  21. Gomes AC. Tratamento restaurador atraumático como alternativa de tratamento em bebês portadores de fissura, relato de caso clínico. Revista Odontológica de Araçatuba, v.24, n.2, 52-55, 2003.
  22. Groisman M, Frossard WM, Ferreira HM, DE Menezes FLM, Touati B. Single-tooth implants in the maxillary incisor region with immediate provisionalization: 2-year prospective study. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent;15:115-122, 2003.
  23. Irinakis T. Rationale for socket preservation after extraction of a single-rooted tooth when planning for future implant placement. J Can Dent Assoc;72:917-922, 2007.
  24. Jahangiri L, Devlin H, Ting K, Nishimura I. Current perspectives in residual ridge remodeling and its clinical implications: a review. J Prosthet Dent; 80:224–37, 1998.
  25. Wheeler SL, Vogel RE, Casellini R. Tissue preservation and maintenance of optimum esthetics: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants;15:265-271, 2000.
  26. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Lozada J. Immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: 1-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants;18:31-39, 2003.
  27. Vescovi P, Campisi G, Fusco V, Mergoni G, Manfredi M, Merigo. Surgery-triggered and non surgery-triggered bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (BRONJ): a retro- spective analysis of 567 cases in an Italian multicenter study. Oral Oncol 47:191–194, 2011.

How to Cite

Reis, M. C. V. dos, Oliveira, L. M. de, Santos, P. D. dos, & Kassis, E. N. (2022). Major clinical findings of minimally invasive surgery in dentistry: a systematic review. MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 3(S3). https://doi.org/10.54448/mdnt22S309