Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
MedNext Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
Review
DOI: 10.54448/mdnt22S103
Submitted: 04-04-2022
Published: 04-04-2022

CAD-CAM system in dental implants: a systematic review

AR Odontología Especializada, Guayaquil, Ecuador; UNORP - University Center North Paulista - Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil; UNIPOS - Post graduate and continuing education, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Clínica Integral y Estética, Quito, Ecuador; UNORP - University Center North Paulista - Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil; UNIPOS - Post graduate and continuing education, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
UNORP - University Center North Paulista - Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil; UNIPOS - Post graduate and continuing education, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Dental Implant CAD-CAM Dental Prosthesis Intraoral scanner

Abstract

Introduction: In the scenario of dental implant procedures, the intraoral scanner and milling unit are used to manufacture a computer-aided design and a computer-aided surgical and radiographic guide. In this sense, the use of CAD-CAM systems is highlighted in the processes of a prosthesis and dental implants, promoting the fabrication of prostheses based on a state-of-the-art three-dimensional system. Objective: Conduct a systematic review of the main considerations of the CAD-CAM system for the development of prostheses and dental implants. Methods: The present study was followed by a systematic literature review model - PRISMA rules. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument. The risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: The use of digital tools for the automated fabrication of implant parts (CAD-CAM) is an optimizing reality in Dentistry. CAD-CAM enables high-quality, standardized, accurate, and detail-perfect prosthetic restorations. The use of metallic implants in the morse cone system in association with zirconia abutments guarantees a final product with mechanical resistance, biocompatibility, and esthetics.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. DuVall NB. Fabricating a chairside CAD-CAM radiographic and surgical guide for dental implants: A dental technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Jan;125(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.11.019. Epub 2020 Feb 3. PMID: 32029216.
  2. Herschdorfer L, Negreiros WM, Gallucci GO, Hamilton A. Comparison of the accuracy of implants placed with CAD-CAM surgical templates manufactured with various 3D printers: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Jun;125(6):905-910. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.017. Epub 2020 Jun 2. PMID: 32499166.
  3. Yilmaz B, Çakmak G, Batak B, Johnston WM. Screw stability of CAD-CAM titanium and zirconia abutments on different implants: An in vitro study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Jun;23(3):373-379. doi: 10.1111/cid.13001. Epub 2021 May 2. PMID: 33938119.
  4. Zaniol T, Zaniol A, Tedesco A, Ravazzolo S. The Low Window Sinus Lift: A CAD-CAM-Guided Surgical Technique for Lateral Sinus Augmentation: A Retrospective Case Series. Implant Dent. 2018 May 28. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000776.
  5. Moris ICM, Monteiro SB, Martins R, Ribeiro RF, Gomes EA. Influence of Manufacturing Methods of Implant-Supported Crowns on External and Internal Marginal Fit: A Micro-CT Analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jan 23;2018:5049605. doi: 10.1155/2018/5049605. eCollection 2018.
  6. Pesce P, Pera F, Setti P, Menini M. Precision and Accuracy of a Digital Impression Scanner in Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitation. Int J Prosthodont. 2018 Mar/Apr;31(2):171-175. doi: 10.11607/ijp.5535.
  7. Yilmaz B, Kale E, Johnston WM. Marginal discrepancy of CAD-CAM complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks. J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Feb 21. pii: S0022-3913(17)30835-1. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.11.021.
  8. Spies BC, Pieralli S, Vach K, Kohal R-J. CAD/CAM-fabricated ceramic implant-supported single crowns made from lithium disilicate: Final results of a 5-year prospective cohort study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017; 00:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12508.
  9. Sheridan RR, Verrett R, Haney S, Schoolfield J. Effect of Split-File Digital Workflow on Crown Margin Adaptation. J Prosthodont. 2017 Jun 9. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12606.
  10. Yeung S, Aghvinian R, Aalam AA, Jivraj S. CAD-CAM approach to designing and fabricating a low-maintenance metal-acrylic resin implant-supported fixed complete dental prosthesis: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2021 May;125(5):719-722. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 Jun 20. PMID: 32576372.
  11. Christensen GJ: In-office CAD/CAM milling of restorations: the future? J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:83-85.
  12. Christensen GJ: In-office CAD/CAM milling of restorations: the future? J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:83-85.
  13. Buchi DL, Ebler S, H ¨ ammerle CHF, et al: Marginal and internal ¨ fit of curved anterior CAD/CAM-milled zirconia fixed dental prostheses: an in-vitro study. Quintessence Int 2014;45:837-846.
  14. Kayatt FE, Neves FD. Aplicação dos Sistemas CAD/CAM na Odontologia Restauradora. Editora Elsevier. 1a edição, 2013.
  15. Kocaagaoglu H, Kilinç Hl, Albayrak H. Effect of digital impressions and production protocols on the adaptation of zirconia copings. J Prosthet Dent. 2017; 117(1): 102-108.
  16. DuVall NB, DeReis SP, Vandewalle KS. Fracture strength of various titanium-based, CAD-CAM and PFM implant crowns. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021 Apr;33(3):522-530. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12672. Epub 2020 Nov 10. PMID: 33174333.
  17. Abdel Raheem IM, Hammad IA, Abel Kader SH, Fahmy RA. Fabrication of a CAD-CAM custom healing abutment guided by a conventional dental radiograph for delayed loaded dental implants: A dental technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Nov 13:S0022-3913(20)30563-1. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.022. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 33198988.
  18. Su FY, Tsai JC, Morton D, Lin WS. Use of intraoral scan for implant-supported dental prosthesis to design and fabricate a CAD-CAM verification device: A dental technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Feb;125(2):204-207. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.02.016. Epub 2020 Apr 16. PMID: 32307114.
  19. Navarro Cuéllar C, Tousidonis Rial M, Antúnez-Conde R, Ochandiano Caicoya S, Navarro Cuéllar I, Arenas de Frutos G, Sada Urmeneta Á, García-Hidalgo Alonso MI, Navarro Vila C, Salmerón Escobar JI. Virtual Surgical Planning, Stereolitographic Models and CAD/CAM Titanium Mesh for Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Fibula Flap with Iliac Crest Graft and Dental Implants. J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 29;10(9):1922. doi: 10.3390/jcm10091922. PMID: 33946731; PMCID: PMC8124267.
  20. De Angelis P, Gasparini G, Camodeca F, De Angelis S, Liguori MG, Rella E, Cannata F, D'Addona A, Manicone PF. Technical and Biological Complications of Screw-Retained (CAD/CAM) Monolithic and Partial Veneer Zirconia for Fixed Dental Prostheses on Posterior Implants Using a Digital Workflow: A 3-Year Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study. Biomed Res Int. 2021 Jul 6;2021:5581435. doi: 10.1155/2021/5581435. PMID: 34307657; PMCID: PMC8279852.
  21. Jovanović M, Živić M, Milosavljević M. A potential application of materials based on a polymer and CAD/CAM composite resins in prosthetic dentistry. J Prosthodont Res. 2021 Jun 30;65(2):137-147. doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPOR_2019_404. Epub 2020 Sep 26. PMID: 32981910.

How to Cite

Rodriguez Martrus, A. M., Sánchez, C. A., & Kassis, E. N. (2022). CAD-CAM system in dental implants: a systematic review. MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 3(S1). https://doi.org/10.54448/mdnt22S103