Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
MedNext Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
Review
DOI: 10.54448/mdnt22S101
Submitted: 04-04-2022
Published: 04-04-2022

Minimally traumatic implantation and bone regeneration: a systematic review

Centro Odontologico Odan Dental, Edificio City Office piso 9 oficina 933, Av Benjamín Carrión Mora & Dr Emilio Romero Menéndez, Guayaquil - Ecuador; UNORP - University Center North Paulista - Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil; UNIPOS - Post graduate and continuing education, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Clínica Dental STY. Av. 9 de Octubre y Av. Ignacio de Veintimilla. Torre B sexto piso Quito – Ecuador; UNORP - University Center North Paulista - Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil; UNIPOS - Post graduate and continuing education, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Clínica Integral y Estética. Av. Diego de Vázquez N64-85 y calle San Carlos. Cotocollao. Quito – Ecuador; UNORP - University Center North Paulista - Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil; UNIPOS - Post graduate and continuing education, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
UNORP - University Center North Paulista - Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil; UNIPOS - Post graduate and continuing education, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Implantology Implants Minimally traumatic surgery Bone regeneration Biomaterials

Abstract

Introduction: Dental implant procedures have reached about one million dental implants per year worldwide. In this context, it is necessary to establish the state of the art of minimally traumatic procedures for dental implants, especially after bone grafting procedures and/or use of biomaterials for bone elevation. Objective: Conducted a systematic review of the main considerations for optimizing techniques for dental implants by proposing minimally invasive procedures, especially after bone recovery or elevation processes through the use of biomaterials such as FRP and Bio-Oss®. Methods: The survey was conducted from June 2021 to July 2021 and developed based on Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo and Google Scholar, following the rules of Systematic Review-PRISMA. Study quality was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. Results and Conclusion: Studies have shown that guided preoperative planning and dental implant-guided jaw reconstruction provide high success rates for implant and dental rehabilitation. Furthermore, the concept of using personalized implants with the help of 3D virtual treatment planning can greatly improve mandibular restoration and help to achieve good facial profile, esthetics and dental rehabilitation, avoiding complications with grafts in general.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. You JS, Kim SG, Oh JS, Kim JS. Effects of Platelet-Derived Material (Platelet-Rich Fibrin) on Bone Regeneration. Implant Dent. 2019 Mar 8 [doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000877].
  2. Pye AD, Lockhart DEA, Dawson MP, Murray CA, Smith AJ. A review of dental implants and infection. J Hosp Infect ; 2009, 72:104–110.
  3. bra°nemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 16:1–192, 1977.
  4. Bugarin Júnior JG, Garrafaii V. Bioethics and biosafety: the use of biomaterials in dental practice. Rev Saúde Pública;41(2):223-8, 2007.
  5. Abdel-Kader, M.A., Abdelazeem, A.F., Ahmed, N.E.B., Khalil, Y.M., Mostafa, M.I. Oral rehabilitation of a case with regional odontodysplasia using a regenerative approach-A case report and a review of literature. Spec Care Dentist. 2019, May;39(3):330-339. doi: 10.1111/scd.12378. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
  6. Arab, H., Shiezadeh, F., Moeintaghavi, A., Anbiaei, N., Mohamadi, S. Comparison of Two Regenerative Surgical Treatments for Peri-Implantitis Defect using Natix Alone or in Combination with Bio-Oss and Collagen Membrane. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2016;26(3):199-204. doi: 10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.2016016396.
  7. Chiapasco M., Casentini P., Zaniboni M. Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl: 237-59.
  8. Choukroun J, Diss A., Simonpieri A, Girard M.O. Schhoffler C., Dohan S.L., et al.Platelet-rich-fibrin (PRF): a second generation platelet concentrate. Part IV: clinical effects on tissue healing. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod 2006: 101 (3): e 56 – 60.
  9. Diana, C., Mohanty, S., Chaudhary, Z., Kumari, S., Dabas, J., Bodh, R. Does platelet-rich fibrin have a role in osseointegration of immediate implants? A randomized, single-blind, controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Sep;47(9):1178-1188. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2018.01.001. Epub 2018 May 7.
  10. Canellas JVDS, Drugos L, Ritto FG, Fischer RG, Medeiros PJD. Xenograft materials in maxillary sinus floor elevation surgery: a systematic review with network meta-analyses. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Feb 23:S0266-4356(21)00075-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2021.02.009. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34120778.
  11. Kyyak S, Blatt S, Schiegnitz E, Heimes D, Staedt H, Thiem DGE, Sagheb K, Al-Nawas B, Kämmerer PW. Activation of Human Osteoblasts via Different Bovine Bone Substitute Materials With and Without Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin in vitro. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Feb 17;9:599224. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.599224. PMID: 33681155; PMCID: PMC7925396.
  12. Shen MH, Huang YL, Li Z, Zhang YD, He YP, Wang L. [Effect of platelet rich fibrin combining with Bio-oss to treat furcation involvement]. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2018 Oct;27(5):508-512. Chinese. PMID: 30680396.
  13. Xuan F, Lee CU, Son JS, Jeong SM, Choi BH. A comparative study of the regenerative effect of sinus bone grafting with platelet-rich fibrin-mixed Bio-Oss® and commercial fibrin-mixed Bio-Oss®: an experimental study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014 Jun;42(4):e47-50 [ doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2013.05.029. Epub 2013 Aug 2].
  14. Mazaro JVQ, Godoy PAI, Junior JFS, Mello CC, Pellizzer EP, Zavanelli AC; Regeneração óssea guiada em implantodontia: relato de caso; RFO, Passo Fundo, v. 19, n. 1, p. 121-128, 2014.
  15. Tahmaseb A, Wu V, Wismeijer D, et al. The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res; 29(Suppl 16):416–35, 2018.
  16. Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D, Coucke W, et al. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 29(Suppl):25–42, 2014.
  17. Jung RE, Schneider D, Ganeles J, et al. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 24(Suppl):92–109, 2009.
  18. D’Haese J, Van De Velde T, Komiyama A, et al. Accuracy and complications using computer-designed stereolithographic surgical guides for oral rehabilitation by means of dental implants: a review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res;14:321–35, 2012.
  19. Oh JH, An X, Jeong SM, et al. Digital workflow for computer-guided implant surgery in edentulous patients: a case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg ;75: 2541–9, 2017.
  20. El Kholy K, Janner SFM, Schimmel M, et al. The influence of guided sleeve height, drilling distance, and drilling key length on the accuracy of static computerassisted implant surgery. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res;21(1):101–7, 2019.
  21. Zhou W, Liu Z, Song L, et al. Clinical factors affecting the accuracy of guided implant surgery-a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract;18:28–40, 2018.
  22. Raico Gallardo YN, Da Silva-Olivio IRT, Mukai E, et al. Accuracy comparison of guided surgery for dental implants according to the tissue of support: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res;28:602–12, 2017.
  23. Seo C, Juodzbalys G. Accuracy of guided surgery via stereolithographic mucosa-supported surgical guide in implant surgery for edentulous patient: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Res;9:e1, 2018.
  24. Cassetta M, Bellardini M. How much does experience in guided implant surgery play a role in accuracy? A randomized controlled pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg;46:922–30, 2017.
  25. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  26. H Balshem H, Grade guidelines: 3 ratng the quality of evidence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Maryland Heights, 64 (4) (2011) 401-406.
  27. Higgins, S Green, Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.
  28. Neto, R.M.S., Zotarelli-Filho , I.J. & Ribeiro da Silva, C.E.X.S. Meta-analysis of the Major Clinical Results of the Treatment with 1-Point Fixation in Fractures in the Zygomatic-Maxillary Complex: Success Rate and Complications. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-021-01603-3
  29. Fang J, Xin XR, Li W, Wang HC, Lv HX, Zhou YM. Immediate implant placement in combination with platelet rich-fibrin into extraction sites with periapical infection in the esthetic zone: A case report and review of literature. World J Clin Cases. 2021 Feb 6;9(4):960-969. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i4.960. PMID: 33585645; PMCID: PMC7852644.
  30. Starch-Jensen, T., Aludden, H., Hallman, M., Dahlin, C., Christensen, A.E., Mordenfeld, A. A systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term studies (five or more years) assessing maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jan;47(1):103-116. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 22.
  31. Strauss, F.J., Stähli, A., Gruber, R. The use of platelet-rich fibrin to enhance the outcomes of implant therapy: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 18:6-19. doi: 10.1111/clr.13275.
  32. Zhou J, Li X, Sun X, Qi M, Chi M, Yin L, Zhou Y. Bone regeneration around immediate placed implant of molar teeth with autologous platelet-rich fibrin: Two case reports. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(44):e13058. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013058.
  33. Kempraj J, Sundaram SS, Doss GPT, Nakeeran KP, Raja VBKK. Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Xenograft and Choukroun's Platelet-Rich Fibrin as Grafting Material: A Radiological Study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2020 Jun;19(2):263-268. doi: 10.1007/s12663-019-01197-x. Epub 2019 Feb 26. PMID: 32346238; PMCID: PMC7176753.
  34. Li P, Zhu H, Huang D. Autogenous DDM versus Bio-Oss granules in GBR for immediate implantation in periodontal postextraction sites: A prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Dec;20(6):923-928. doi: 10.1111/cid.12667. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
  35. Moreira AC, Silva JR, Samico RP, Nishioka GNM, Nishioka RS. Application of Bio-Oss in tissue regenerative treatment prior to implant installation: literature review. Braz Dent Sci. 22(2), 2019.
  36. Rungcharassaeng K, Caruso JM, Kan JY, et al. Accuracy of computer-guided surgery: a comparison of operator experience. J Prosthet Dent;114:407–13, 2015.
  37. Shenaq DS, Matros E. Virtual planning and navigational technology in reconstructive surgery. J Surg Oncol. Oct;118(5):845-852. doi: 10.1002/jso.25255. Epub 2018 Oct 7, 2018.
  38. D'Haese J, Ackhurst J, Wismeijer D, De Bruyn H, Tahmaseb A. Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery. Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):121-133. doi: 10.1111/prd.12175.
  39. Pommer B, Busenlechner D, Fürhauser R, Watzek G, Mailath-Pokorny G, Haas R. Trends in techniques to avoid bone augmentation surgery: Application of short implants, narrow-diameter implants and guided surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 Oct;44(10):1630-1634. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Aug 21.
  40. Oliveira G, Mattos W, Albaricci M, Marcantonio É, Queiroz T, Margonar R. Original Research: Analysis of linear and angular deviations of implants installed with a tomographic guided surgery technique. A prospective cohort-study. J Oral Implantol. 2019 Jun 17. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-18-00265.
  41. Al Yafi F, Camenisch B, Al-Sabbagh M. Is Digital Guided Implant Surgery Accurate and Reliable? Dent Clin North Am. 2019 Jul;63(3):381-397. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
  42. Albiero AM, Benato R, Momic S, Degidi M. Guided-welded approach planning using a computer-aided designed prosthetic shell for immediately loaded complete-arch rehabilitations supported by conometric abutments. J Prosthet Dent. 2019 May 8. pii: S0022-3913(18)30742-X. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.12.002.
  43. Tallarico M, Martinolli M, Kim Y, Cocchi F, Meloni SM, Alushi A, Xhanari E. Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Template-Based Implant Placement Using Two Different SurgicalTemplates Designed with or without Metallic Sleeves: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Dent J (Basel). 2019 Apr 2;7(2). pii: E41. doi: 10.3390/dj7020041.
  44. Zhu H, Zhang L, Cai Z, Shan X. Dental Implant Rehabilitation After Jaw Reconstruction Assisted by Virtual Surgical Planning. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 Feb 19. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7278.

How to Cite

Alvarez, O., López, S., Sánchez, C. A., & Kassis, E. N. (2022). Minimally traumatic implantation and bone regeneration: a systematic review. MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 3(S1). https://doi.org/10.54448/mdnt22S101