Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Review
Published: 22-02-2022

Major considerations of minimally invasive surgery in bucomaxillofacial procedures: quality of life and aesthetics

UNORP - University Center North Paulista - Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil / UNIPOS - Post graduate and continuing education, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
UNORP - University Center North Paulista - Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil / UNIPOS - Post graduate and continuing education, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Minimally invasive surgery Maxillofacial surgery Atraumatic procedures Dentistry

Abstract

Introduction: In minimally invasive or atraumatic surgery or dental procedures, there are several clinical studies with increasing expectations to establish treatment guidelines. It is estimated that in minimally invasive dental surgery in general, synthesis studies with meta-analysis and decision analysis represent almost 29% of all studies. Objective: Demonstrate, through a systematic review of the literature, the evolution and consequent importance of improving surgical techniques and/or minimally invasive treatments in dentistry. It was hypothesized that there were statistically significant results on advances in the attempt to minimize trauma, providing quality of life and better aesthetics to patients. Methods: The present study was followed by a systematic review model (PRISMA). The search strategy was performed in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. The Cochrane Instrument was used to assess the risk of bias of the included studies. Results: The total of 92 articles involving minimally invasive surgery and dentistry were found. A total of 54 articles were fully evaluated and 23 were included in the present study. Considering the Cochrane tool for risk of bias, the overall assessment resulted in 3 studies with a high risk of bias (studies with small sample size) and 2 studies with uncertain risk (studies with results without statistical significance). Since the most primordial extraction techniques were created and developed, several attempts have been made to minimize the professional's effort, reduce surgical time and alleviate bleeding and the inflammatory processes, edema, pain, and ecchymosis that can affect patients, in trans and postoperative periods. Thus, the maximum preservation of the integrity of the soft tissues (papillae and free and inserted gingival band) adjacent to the prosthetic spaces should be sought; preservation of the alveolar bone ridge level. Based on the histological concept in which living tissues are formed by cells joined by thin elastic tissue and with nerve fibrils, capillaries, lymphatic and blood vessels. The disruption of these cells by surgical trauma provides the release of enzymes that delay healing. For this reason, surgical trauma should be minimized. Conclusion: There are many attempts to minimize the professional effort, reduce surgical time and alleviate bleeding and inflammatory processes, edema, pain, and ecchymosis that can affect patients. Thus, the maximum preservation of the integrity of the soft tissues adjacent to the prosthetic spaces and the preservation of the level of the ridge of the alveolar bone to achieve a minimization of surgical trauma must be sought.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Rekawek P, Wu B, Hanna T. Minimally Invasive Cosmetic Procedures, Social Media, and Oral-Maxillofacial Surgery: Use of Trends for the Modern Practice. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Apr;79(4):739-740. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.10.038. Epub 2020 Nov 6. PMID: 33259784.
  2. Custódio ALN, Cameron A, Bakr M, Little C, Chrcanovic BR, Reher P. Positioning accuracy assessment of minimally invasive percutaneous injection techniques for the treatment of temporomandibular disorders. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021 Feb 1;50(2):20200313. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20200313. Epub 2020 Jul 24. PMID: 32706994; PMCID: PMC7860951.
  3. Al Qabbani A, Al Kawas S, Enezei H, Razak NHA, Al Bayatti SW, Samsudin AR, Hamid SAB. Biomechanical and radiological assessment of immediate implants for alveolar ridge preservation. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 15(6):420-429, 2018.
  4. Amorim RE, Leal SC, Frencken JE. Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis. Clin Oral Invest, 2011.
  5. Barreto VC. Avaliação das restaurações atraumáticas em pré-escolares. Dissertação (mestrado)-Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Faculdade de odontologia. Porto Alegre, 2007.
  6. Krug R, Connert T, Soliman S, Syfrig B, Dietrich T, Krastl G. Surgical extrusion with an atraumatic extraction system: A clinical study. J Prosthet Dent. 120(6):879-885, 2018 [doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.02.006. Epub 2018 Jun 28].
  7. Brasil. Ministério da saúde / Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Documento base da III Conferência Nacional de Saúde Bucal: acesso e qualidade, superando a exclusão social. Brasília, 2004.
  8. Cardoso AC. O. Passo-a-Passo da Prótese Sobre Implante. Ed. Santos, 1ª ed, 2005.
  9. Carvalho PS. Gerenciando os Riscos e Complicações em Implantodontia. Ed. Santos. São Paulo, 2007.
  10. Carvalho LS. Tratamento restaurador atraumático em cavidades atípicas. Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia. Porto Alegre, v.57, n.3, 357-362, 2009.
  11. Madhura MG, Rao RS, Patil S, Alhazmi YA, Jafer M, Habib SR, Awan KH. Minimally invasive procedures for the recognition and diagnosis of oral precancer and cancer. Dis Mon. 2020 Dec;66(12):101033. doi: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2020.101033. Epub 2020 Jun 30. PMID: 32620265.
  12. Kim JE, Shim JS, Shin Y. A new minimally invasive guided endodontic microsurgery by cone beam computed tomography and 3-dimensional printing technology. Restor Dent Endod. 2019 Jul 25;44(3):e29. doi: 10.5395/rde.2019.44.e29. eCollection 2019 Aug.
  13. Iraqui O, Lakhssassi N, Berrada S, Merzouk N. Atraumatic bone expansion: Interest of piezo-surgery, conicals expanders and immediate implantation combination. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale. 117(3):151-7, 2016 [doi: 10.1016/j.revsto.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 May 12].
  14. Hayes M, Allen E, Da Mata C, Mckenna G, Burke F. Minimal intervention dentistry and older patients part 2: minimally invasive operativeinterventions. Dent Update. 41(6):500-2, 504-5, 2014.
  15. Cooper LF, Rahman A, Moriarty J. Immediate mandibular rehabilitation with endosseous implants: simultaneous extraction, implant placement, and loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants;17:517-525, 2002.
  16. Covani V, Crespi R, Cornelini R, Barone A. Immediate implants supporting single-crown restoration: a 4 year prospective study. J Periodontol; 75:982-988, 2004.
  17. Foschetti JHM. Tratamento restaurador atraumático associado a medidas preventivas na saúde pública brasileira. Trabalho de conclusão de curso (Especialização) – Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 2010.
  18. Frencken JE, Holmgren CJ. Tratamento restaurador atraumático para a cárie dentária. São Paulo. Santos Editora, 2001.
  19. Gomes AC. Tratamento restaurador atraumático como alternativa de tratamento em bebês portadores de fissura, relato de caso clínico. Revista Odontológica de Araçatuba, v.24, n.2, 52-55, 2003.
  20. Groisman M, Frossard WM, Ferreira HM, De Menezes FLM, Touati B. Single-tooth implants in the maxillary incisor region with immediate provisionalization: 2-year prospective study. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent;15:115-122, 2003.
  21. Wheeler SL, Vogel RE, Casellini R. Tissue preservation and maintenance of optimum esthetics: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants;15:265-271, 2000.
  22. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Lozada J. Immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: 1-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants;18:31-39, 2003.
  23. Vescovi P, Campisi G, Fusco V, Mergoni G, Manfredi M, Merigo E, Solazzo L, Gabriele M, Gaeta GM, Favia G, Peluso F, Colella G. Surgery-triggered and non surgery-triggered Bisphosphonate-related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws (BRONJ): A retrospective analysis of 567 cases in an Italian multicenter study. Oral Oncol. 2011 Mar;47(3):191-4. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.11.007. Epub 2011 Feb 2. PMID: 21292541.

How to Cite

Carvalho, M. do C., & Kassis, E. N. (2022). Major considerations of minimally invasive surgery in bucomaxillofacial procedures: quality of life and aesthetics. MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.54448/mdnt22109