Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Highlight
Published: 17-12-2021

Construction of mammographic findings simulators to study the interference of silicone implants in the diagnosis of breast cancer

UCPEL - Catholic University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
UCPEL - Catholic University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
UCPEL - Catholic University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
UCPEL - Catholic University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
UCPEL - Catholic University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Breast cancer Neoplastic findings Biomaterials

Abstract

Introduction: Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignant neoplasm among women, presenting itself, in 99% of cases, in females. Augmentation mammoplasty is the most performed aesthetic surgical intervention in the world. Objective: This study aims to improve the search for biomaterials compatible with mammographic findings suggestive of malignancy, to further study the interference of silicone implants in mammography exams. Methods: To make the simulators of mammographic findings, a bibliographic study of possible biomaterials that presented compatibility with the breast tissue and with possible neoplastic findings was carried out. The validation process of the simulators made in this work was carried out in two stages. Results: The result found was a density variation between 2.54 and 2.57 (dimensionless unit). For the second plate, the individual optical density of each material was analyzed. The results found for fiberglass ranged between 1.95 and 2.63. For chicken eggshells between 0.59 and 0.80. For the glycerin suppository, values between 1.43 and 2.29 were found. And for plastic PVC film 1.78 to 2.53. Conclusion: Given the above, it is observed that the first plate as a whole is compatible with mammographic studies. However, on the second plate, when the materials were analyzed separately, it was observed that fiberglass and plastic PVC film were the closest to compatibility with the commercial phantom, being compatible materials to simulate breast neoplasms in possible further studies.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. National Cancer Institute (Brazil). Estimate 2020 - Incidence of Cancer in Brazil. Rio de Janeiro: INCA, 2021.
  2. Kim KI, Hee Lee K, Kim TR Changing patterns of microcalcification on screening mammography for prediction of breast cancer. Breast Cancer, 2016, 23, 471–478.
  3. Sosin M, Devulapalli C, Fehring C. Breast Cancer following Augmentation Mammaplasty: A Case-Control Study. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (2018).
  4. Robinson KA, Gray RJ, Tanna A. Patient-Awareness Survey: Do Breast Implants Affect the Acquisition and Accuracy of Screening Mammography? Journal of Breast Imaging, 2019, 1,4: 297–302.
  5. Silva AA. Development of breast simulator for quality control and training. Master's. Federal University of Sergipe (2015).
  6. Siqueira PN. Investigation of microcalcifications and simulated nodules to obtain images from tests of CAD schemes in mammography. Thesis (Masters in Engineering) School of Engineering of São Paulo, University of São Paulo. São Carlos (2015).

How to Cite

Bezerra, L. F., Bezerra, L. F., Kruger, K., Souza, E. G., & Nascimento, C. D. D. do. (2021). Construction of mammographic findings simulators to study the interference of silicone implants in the diagnosis of breast cancer. MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 2(6). https://doi.org/10.54448/mdnt21624