Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
MedNext Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
Review
DOI: 10.54448/mdnt21516
Submitted: 16-12-2021
Published: 16-12-2021

Major advances in minimally traumatic surgery in implantodontics: the concise systematic review

University Center North Paulista (Unorp) - Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil / Post graduate and continuing education (Unipos), Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
University Center North Paulista (Unorp) - Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil / Post graduate and continuing education (Unipos), Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
University Center North Paulista (Unorp) - Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil / Post graduate and continuing education (Unipos), Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
University Center North Paulista (Unorp) - Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil / Post graduate and continuing education (Unipos), Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Minimally traumatic surgery Implantology Clinical studies

Abstract

Introduction: Dental implant procedures have reached about one million dental implants per year in the world. In this context, it is necessary to establish the state of the art of minimally traumatic procedures for dental implants, especially after bone graft procedures and/or the use of biomaterials for bone elevation. In this context of optimizing techniques for better management of dental implants, faster and more accurate methods were developed by dentists, with post-operative results with better results and quality of life, through minimally invasive procedures. Objective: To carry out a concise systematic review of minimally traumatic surgery for dental implants, as well as to elucidate the main techniques for this. Methods: The rules of the Systematic Review Platform-PRISMA were followed. The survey was conducted from July 2021 to October 2021 and was developed based on Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar. Study quality was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. Results: Since the most primordial extraction techniques were created and developed, several attempts have been made to minimize the professional's effort, reduce surgical time and alleviate bleeding and inflammatory processes, edema, pain, and ecchymosis that can affect patients, in the trans and postoperative periods. Thus, the maximum preservation of the integrity of the soft tissues (papillae and free and inserted gingival band) adjacent to the prosthetic spaces should be sought; preservation of the alveolar bone ridge level. Based on the histological concept in which living tissues are formed by cells joined by thin elastic tissue and with nerve fibrils, capillaries, lymphatic and blood vessels. The disruption of these cells by surgical trauma provides the release of enzymes that delay healing. For this reason, surgical trauma should be minimized. Conclusion: There are many attempts to minimize the professional effort, reduce surgical time and alleviate bleeding and inflammatory processes, edema, pain, and ecchymosis that can affect patients. Thus, the maximum preservation of the integrity of the soft tissues adjacent to the prosthetic spaces and the preservation of the level of the ridge of the alveolar bone to achieve a minimization of surgical trauma must be sought.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. You JS, Kim SG, Oh JS, Kim JS. Effects of Platelet-Derived Material (Platelet-Rich Fibrin) on Bone Regeneration. Implant Dent. 2019 Mar 8 [doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000877].
  2. Pye AD, Lockhart DEA, Dawson MP, Murray CA, Smith AJ. A review of dental implants and infection. J Hosp Infect ; 2009, 72:104–110.
  3. bra°nemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 16:1–192, 1977.
  4. Bugarin Júnior JG, Garrafaii V. Bioethics and biosafety: the use of biomaterials in dental practice. Rev Saúde Pública;41(2):223-8, 2007.
  5. Krug R, Connert T, Soliman S, Syfrig B, Dietrich T, Krastl G. Surgical extrusion with an atraumatic extraction system: A clinical study. J Prosthet Dent. 120(6):879-885, 2018 [doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.02.006. Epub 2018 Jun 28].
  6. Al Qabbani A, Al Kawas S, Enezei H, Razak NHA, Al Bayatti SW, Samsudin AR, Hamid SAB. Biomechanical and radiological assessment of immediate implants for alveolar ridge preservation. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 15(6):420-429, 2018.
  7. Iraqui O, Lakhssassi N, Berrada S, Merzouk N. Atraumatic bone expansion: Interest of piezo-surgery, conicals expanders and immediate implantation combination. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale. 117(3):151-7, 2016 [doi: 10.1016/j.revsto.2016.04.002. Epub 2016 May 12].
  8. Amorim RE, Leal SC, Frencken JE. Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis. Clin Oral Invest, 2011.
  9. Mazaro JVQ, Godoy PAI, Junior JFS, Mello CC, Pellizzer EP, Zavanelli AC; Regeneração óssea guiada em implantodontia: relato de caso ; RFO, Passo Fundo, v. 19, n. 1, p. 121-128, 2014.
  10. Tahmaseb A, Wu V, Wismeijer D, et al. The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res; 29(Suppl 16):416–35, 2018.
  11. Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D, Coucke W, et al. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 29(Suppl):25–42, 2014.
  12. Jung RE, Schneider D, Ganeles J, et al. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 24(Suppl):92–109, 2009.
  13. D’Haese J, Van De Velde T, Komiyama A, et al. Accuracy and complications using computer-designed stereolithographic surgical guides for oral rehabilitation by means of dental implants: a review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res;14:321–35, 2012.
  14. Oh JH, An X, Jeong SM, et al. Digital workflow for computer-guided implant surgery in edentulous patients: a case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg ;75: 2541–9, 2017.
  15. El Kholy K, Janner SFM, Schimmel M, et al. The influence of guided sleeve height, drilling distance, and drilling key length on the accuracy of static computerassisted implant surgery. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res;21(1):101–7, 2019.
  16. Zhou W, Liu Z, Song L, et al. Clinical factors affecting the accuracy of guided implant surgery-a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract;18:28–40, 2018.
  17. Raico Gallardo YN, Da Silva-Olivio IRT, Mukai E, et al. Accuracy comparison of guided surgery for dental implants according to the tissue of support: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res;28:602–12, 2017.
  18. Seo C, Juodzbalys G. Accuracy of guided surgery via stereolithographic mucosa-supported surgical guide in implant surgery for edentulous patient: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Res;9:e1, 2018.
  19. Cassetta M, Bellardini M. How much does experience in guided implant surgery play a role in accuracy? A randomized controlled pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg;46:922–30, 2017.
  20. Neto RMS, Zotarelli-Filho IJ, Ribeiro da Silva CEXS. Meta-analysis of the Major Clinical Results of the Treatment with 1-Point Fixation in Fractures in the Zygomatic-Maxillary Complex: Success Rate and Complications. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-021-01603-3.
  21. Hayes M, Allen E, Da Mata C, Mckenna G, Burke F. Minimal intervention dentistry and older patients part 2: minimally invasive operativeinterventions. Dent Update. 41(6):500-2, 504-5, 2014.
  22. Cooper LF, Rahman A, Moriarty J. Immediate mandibular rehabilitation with endosseous implants: simultaneous extraction, implant placement, and loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants;17:517-525, 2002.
  23. Covani V, Crespi R, Cornelini R, Barone A. Immediate implants supporting single-crown restoration: a 4 year prospective study. J Periodontol; 75:982-988, 2004.
  24. Foschetti, J.H.M. Tratamento restaurador atraumático associado a medidas preventivas na saúde pública brasileira. Trabalho de conclusão de curso (Especialização) – Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, 2010.
  25. Barreto, V.C. Avaliação das restaurações atraumáticas em pré-escolares. Dissertação (mestrado)-Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Faculdade de odontologia. Porto Alegre, 2007.
  26. Irinakis T. Rationale for socket preservation after extraction of a single-rooted tooth when planning for future implant placement. J Can Dent Assoc;72:917-922, 2007.
  27. Wheeler SL, Vogel RE, Casellini R. Tissue preservation and maintenance of optimum esthetics: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014, 15:265-271.
  28. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Lozada J. Immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: 1-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014, 18:31-39.
  29. Vescovi P, Campisi G, Fusco V, Mergoni G, Manfredi M, Merigo. Surgery-triggered and non surgery-triggered bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (BRONJ): a retro- spective analysis of 567 cases in an Italian multicenter study. Oral Oncol 47:191–194, 2011.
  30. Frencken JE, Holmgren CJ. Tratamento restaurador atraumático para a cárie dentária. São Paulo. Santos Editora, 2001.

How to Cite

Ravasoli, A. L., Paula, P. F. de, Silva, T. R. da, & Kassis, E. N. (2021). Major advances in minimally traumatic surgery in implantodontics: the concise systematic review. MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 2(5). https://doi.org/10.54448/mdnt21516