Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
MedNext Journal of Medical and Health Sciences
Review
DOI: 10.54448/mdnt21514
Submitted: 16-12-2021
Published: 16-12-2021

Digital dentistry and guided treatments: a concise systematic review

University Center North Paulista (Unorp), Graduate in Dentistry, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil / Post graduate and continuing education (Unipos), Postgraduate in dentistry, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
University Center North Paulista (Unorp), Graduate in Dentistry, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil / Post graduate and continuing education (Unipos), Postgraduate in dentistry, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
University Center North Paulista (Unorp), Graduate in Dentistry, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil / Post graduate and continuing education (Unipos), Postgraduate in dentistry, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Digital technologies Computed tomography Dental scanners Guided surgery Project-guided dental surgery

Abstract

Introduction: In the landscape of new digital technologies, many dental treatments have benefited from this digital advance. The development of computed tomography (CT) dental scanners has enabled powerful imaging capabilities and software applications. The prosthetic plane and implanted drill guides with the placement of trajectories based on a drill according to the position of the CT 3-D Space markers. Objective: To present, through a systematic review, the main considerations of guided surgery in implant dentistry and its respective advantages, disadvantages, and limitations. Methods: Clinical studies with qualitative and/or quantitative analysis were included, following the rules of the systematic review-PRISMA. Results: Out of a total of 102 articles found, 82 articles were evaluated and 57 were rejected for not meeting the GRADE classification, and only 25 articles were used in this study to compose the textual part. Advances in technology have contributed to the improvement of implant models. 3D reconstructions make it possible to determine the quantity and quality of available bone and also enable the simulation of implant installation in a virtual environment, reducing time and the possibility of errors, allowing for an overall reduction in the costs of oral rehabilitation. Conclusion: Guided preoperative planning or project-guided dental surgery provides high implant and dental rehabilitation success rates, also benefiting prosthetic restorations supported by fixed implants. Furthermore, the concept of using personalized implants with the help of 3D virtual treatment planning improves mandibular restoration with a good facial profile, esthetics, and dental rehabilitation.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Greenberg AM. Digital technologies for dental implant treatment planning and guided surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2015 May;27(2):319-40. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2015.01.010. PMID: 25951962.
  2. Smitkarn P, Subbalekha K, Mattheos N, Pimkhaokham A. The accuracy of single-tooth implants placed using fully digital-guided surgery and freehand implant surgery. J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Sep;46(9):949-957. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13160. Epub 2019 Jul 19. PMID: 31241782.
  3. Chen P, Nikoyan L. Guided Implant Surgery: A Technique Whose Time Has Come. Dent Clin North Am. 2021 Jan;65(1):67-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2020.09.005. Epub 2020 Nov 2. PMID: 33213716.
  4. Mazaro JVQ, Godoy Pai, Junior JFS, Mello CC, Pellizzer EP, Zavanelli AC; Regeneração óssea guiada em implantodontia: relato de caso ; RFO, Passo Fundo, 2014, v. 19, n. 1, p. 121-128.
  5. Tahmaseb A, WU V, Wismeijer D, et al. The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018, 29(Suppl 16):416–35.
  6. Tahmaseb A, Wismeijer D, Coucke W, et al. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014, 29(Suppl):25–42.
  7. Jung RE, Schneider D, Ganeles J, et al. Computer technology applications in surgical implant dentistry: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009, 24(Suppl):92–109.
  8. D’haese J, Van De Velde T, Komiyama A, et al. Accuracy and complications using computer-designed stereolithographic surgical guides for oral rehabilitation by means of dental implants: a review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012, 14:321–35.
  9. Oh JH, An X, Jeong SM, et al. Digital workflow for computer-guided implant surgery in edentulous patients: a case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 2017, 75: 2541–9.
  10. El Kholy K, Janner SFM, Schimmel M, et al. The influence of guided sleeve height, drilling distance, and drilling key length on the accuracy of static computerassisted implant surgery. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019, 21(1):101–7.
  11. Zhou W, Liu Z, Song L, et al. Clinical factors affecting the accuracy of guided implant surgery-a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2018, 18:28–40.
  12. Raico Gallardo YN, Da Silva-Olivio IRT, Mukai E, et al. Accuracy comparison of guided surgery for dental implants according to the tissue of support: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res;2017, 28:602–12.
  13. Seo C, Juodzbalys G. Accuracy of guided surgery via stereolithographic mucosa-supported surgical guide in implant surgery for edentulous patient: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Res; 2018, 9:e1.
  14. Cassetta M, Bellardini M. How much does experience in guided implant surgery play a role in accuracy? A randomized controlled pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017, 46:922–30.
  15. Rungcharassaeng K, Caruso JM, Kan JY, et al. Accuracy of computer-guided surgery: a comparison of operator experience. J Prosthet Dent; 2015, 114:407–13.
  16. Shenaq DS, Matros E. Virtual planning and navigational technology in reconstructive surgery. J Surg Oncol. 2018, Oct;118(5):845-852. doi: 10.1002/jso.25255. Epub 2018 Oct 7.
  17. D'haese J, Ackhurst J, Wismeijer D, De Bruyn H, Tahmaseb A. Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery. Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):121-133. doi: 10.1111/prd.12175.
  18. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 6(7): e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.
  19. Balshem H et al. Grade guidelines: 3 ratng the quality of evidence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Maryland Heights, v. 64, n. 4, p. 401-406, 2011.
  20. Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.
  21. Søndergaard K, Hosseini M, Storgård Jensen S, Spin-Neto R, Gotfredsen K. Fully versus conventionally guided implant placement by dental students: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Sep;32(9):1072-1084. doi: 10.1111/clr.13802. Epub 2021 Jul 5. PMID: 34166539.
  22. Henprasert P, Dawson DV, El-Kerdani T, Song X, Couso-Queiruga E, Holloway JA. Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques. J Prosthodont. 2020 Jul;29(6):534-541. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13161. Epub 2020 May 6. PMID: 32147893.
  23. Bover-Ramos F, Viña-Almunia J, Cervera-Ballester J, Peñarrocha-Diago M, García-Mira B. Accuracy of Implant Placement with Computer-Guided Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Cadaver, Clinical, and In Vitro Studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 January/February;33(1):101–115. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5556. Epub 2017 Jun 20. PMID: 28632253.
  24. Jorba-García A, González-Barnadas A, Camps-Font O, Figueiredo R, Valmaseda-Castellón E. Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer-aided implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 May;25(5):2479-2494. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03833-8. Epub 2021 Feb 26. PMID: 33635397.
  25. Oliveira G, Mattos W, Albaricci M, Marcantonio É, Queiroz T, Margonar R. Original Research: Analysis of linear and angular deviations of implants installed with a tomographic guided surgery technique. A prospective cohort-study. J Oral Implantol. 2019 Jun 17. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-18-00265.

How to Cite

Garcia, G., Brito, T. T., & Buchala, C. A. C. N. (2021). Digital dentistry and guided treatments: a concise systematic review. MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 2(5). https://doi.org/10.54448/mdnt21514